RyanX notes the recent spike in public awareness of the role that Earth’s magnetic field(s) play in all kinds of events, then brings in Prof Jim McCanney’s electric comet theory and wonders if Gurdjieff was talking plainly when he stated that humanity is “food for the moon”…

Pole Shift? Look to the Skies! — Sott.net

www.sott.net

In my previous article And They March…, I touched on the possibility that the mass death of blackbirds over Beebe, Arkansas was caused by the shockwave from an airbursting bolide or comet fragment. While that explanation seemed to fit with the fact…
.
“The Claim 2010 is ‘2nd warmest year on record’ – is delusional, irrelevant & disingenuous – the last gasp of the failed global warming cult”  

  • · The ideologically driven global warmist joke must be swept aside. The time has come for useful science-based forecasts to reduce misery & save lives.
  • · More end Jan extreme warnings for USA, Australia + UK/Europe.
  • · The most exciting weather year for a century has begun.

“The latest claims about World average temperatures by Government Weather organizations around the World such as UK MetOffice*, apart from being contrary to the actual experience of the majority of the world population – notably USA, Europe, IndoChina and South America, raise four points.  (* http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2011/2010-global-temperature )

1.      “The originators of this data are the same people and organizations who were caught fiddling data in the ‘ClimateGate’ affair,” said Piers. “The various whitewash enquiries arranged to cover-up their vandalisation of the scientific method cannot dodge the question:

  • · WHY is there a statistically highly significant systematic inverse relationship between the number of stations they selected for ‘official’ use and the average temperatures resulting? What average temperature would result from the 62% of stations they removed since around the 1960s – which had the coldest temperature averages and the highest number of stations – up to the present decade – which is officially the warmest and has the least number of stations?  Anyone with a brain can see that this systematic connection means that either temperature is magically determined by the number of stations or there has been systematic selecting of data which is best described as data fraud”, said Piers.  “This question requires an international inquiry which is independent of any of the organizations involved in this data creation.  ( See See slide 9 in presentation http://www.weatheraction.com/displayarticle.asp?a=222&c=1 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPMmCruPAWU )

2.       “The experience of EXTREME cold for prolonged periods this year in a number of parts of the world – such as Britain, West Europe, most of the USA and much of South America (to name just a few) and the inane ‘cold is warm’ incantations, show the world average supposed extra warmth (which only exceeds the coldest year of the decade under their figures by 0.12 degree C – less than one quarter of a degree F) – is of no consequence or forecasting value whatsoever to man or beast.  A one quarter of a degree F increase in world average temperatures whether real or fraudulent has no bearing on whether or not a blizzard will hit Connecticut; any more than a world population rise CAUSES more babies to be born in Birmingham” said Piers.

3.       “The innuendo that this supposed ‘warmest year’ is somehow the driver of extreme events is baseless anti-science.  It is no accident that the Met Office, BBC and New York Times / Guardian / Independent etc put forward various descriptions of circulation patterns such as La Nina as a cause of the things these phenomena describe and then pop-in that 2010 was the warmest year as if there were a connection. Why not tell us there is a Royal wedding this year, that would be more interesting.  The only connection is their desperation to save their failed cult ideology.

ALL the global warmist predictions since 2000 have failed and the OPPOSITE types of extremes (floods, supercold and blizzards) to their predictions (droughts, warm winters and the end-of-snow) have occurred, so their warmist (or warm is cold) explanations for extreme events are as useless as saying “Wet days cause rain”.

If weather were just entertainment this would not matter but their refusal to accept their total failure forces up energy and food prices through low carbon cult measures and holds back real science which directly prevents governments and authorities from applying useful forecasts which can reduce suffering and save lives.  People have died on UK and Europe’s roads through lack of winter salting due to Met Office failed warmist winter forecasts and Australian floods are worse because the Govt cut dam projects under Green ‘expect droughts’ advice – http://climaterealists.com/7038 . The Global warming cult ideology is reducing living standards and causing needless suffering and death, and must be stopped.”

4.        The very extreme weather events around the world last year and this year are caused by solar-lunar DRIVEN ‘sticking’ of the normal motions of the jet streams in the North and South hemisphere and of the Inter Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ).

(i)             Piers Corbyn of WeatherAction warned in June 2010 that such sticking and consequent SEVERE EXTREMES would be consequent to PREDICTABLE solar-lunar effects in periods to follow which we now expect will be years and he specifically correctly predicted:

(ii)            The West Russian heatwave and when it would end to the day (along with the ending of the associated superfloods in Pakistan) driven by events on the sun – See link of the double sunspot solar explosion (video) and subsequent thunderstorms in St Petersburg Aug 15th 2010 – http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews10No31.pdf

Will the warmists tell us that solar flares are caused by CO2 on Earth?!

(iii)          That Britain (Central England) would have the coldest December for 100 years. NB The UK Met Office had said on their web in October that winter would be mild and then when it was cold claimed they had actually said it would be cold while there web still carried the chart published in October which stated it would be mild http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6990 Yet THESE same people expect us to believe their world temperature data is worth a dime!

(iv)          The monster thunderblizzards and snow deluges which hit N / NE parts of USA 26/27 Dec and again Jan 12th (especially Connecticut) and again on 22nd Jan – (5-10 inches in parts of NE and very cold blasts http://www.courant.com/news/weather/ctn-weather-forecast-connecticut-fox-ct,0,4543231.story – and there is more to come – see below!

This very specific stuck jet stream situation in USA bringing this long series of thundersnow – blizzards was specifically spelt out in WeatherAction’s USA forecast via link World Extreme events (except Eur) forecast via via http://www.weatheraction.com/member.asp or http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews11No2.pdf . The New York Times ignores these forecasts rather than admit to its readers than their warmist ideology has failed.

(v)           The Brazil floods are caused by ITCZ sticking (as was graphically shown on CNN) and the Queensland / Australia floods are caused by the Southern Jet stream (S Australia) & ITCZ (N Australia) sticking which follow from a combination of La Nina which is solar driven and specific lunar eclipse phase modulation – http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews11No1.pdf

Does CO2 cause eclipses of the Moon?!

NOW WHAT?

Piers Corbyn said, 21 Jan, “Our long range TOP RED WARNINGS of very extreme events world-wide in the last week of January stand; Specifically:

  • · More USA deluges of very heavy thundersnow and very cold blasts South & East of the Great Lakes and notably in NE /E USA (see link Extreme Events Word Exc Europe via http://www.weatheraction.com/member.asp for more detail as issued Jan 7th) around 25th Jan and again around 28th-30th Jan.  NB since this is the end of that forecast media are free to publish it.
  • · Further Significant Australian deluges and Floods in most probably SW Queensland area – in forecast issued by link above on Jan 9th (Note North New South Wales can be included)
  • · Further blasts and snow in Britain (espec East) and NorthWest Europe in the last few days of January into February. Note a troublesome High has been holding cold air further East than expected (reasons now partly understood) but eventually cold blasts will take over.
  • · Further VERY extreme thunder-rain / snow deluges are likely in many parts of the world 25– 31st Jan.
  • · The year will continue with ongoing jet stream / ITCZ stickings and extreme events many of which we will predict, in detail months ahead by our Solar-Lunar Action Technique, information permitting. This will probably be the most exciting weather year around the world for a century.

It’s an open question as to whether the Warmist cult will switch to a total doublethink ‘cold is warm’ incantation or erase / re-choose / re-homogenize and re-brand most of their ‘data’ stations.  They’ve been talking a lot about merging and rationalizing data sets – which as we all know when governments talk such talk normally means something else.

Other useful links

MUST SEE TWO PART YOUTUBE: Piers Corbyn Returns: The Cold Truth of What is to Come in 2011 – Alex Jones Tv = http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6985

Rense & Piers Corbyn – Solar Lunar Forecasting  video

Where is Weather, Climate and the Climate Change Con going?

5 new videos from Piers Corbyn issued 6 Jan  http://www.weatheraction.com/displayarticle.asp?a=292&c=5

27 Dec Fox News USA “It was an honour & great to be on Fox” says Piers http://video.foxnews.com/v/4475360/mocked-meteorologist-gets-last-laugh/

20 Dec ABCTV USA interviews Piers – http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/extreme-weather-12464251

NOTE The Main USA TV channels reported WeatherAction correctly predicted the coldest December in UK for 100 years, yet the BBC carry nothing. Why?

19 Dec Article in Daily Telegraph by Mayor of London Boris Johnson –  The man who repeatedly beats the Met Office at its own game! http://bit.ly/fy4ddD and my Thank you http://bit.ly/fy4ddD

Piers on SKY NEWS 18Dec We Told You So http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNBlDnA0q3s

VIDEO Piers Corbyn this WINTER forecast summary issued 30 Nov 2010 HELL to Freeze over for Britain Ireland + Europe http://bit.ly/hQBp14

World jet stream shift ends Russia heatwave + Pakistan Superdeluges Piers Corbyn’s Solar-driven forecasts confirmed Aug 2010 http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews10No31.pdf

Extended Russia TV interview 22 Aug 2010 on Piers’ predictions of ending of Russia heatwave & Pakistan superdeluges – http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6173&linkbox=true&position=2

.

Abnormal Sunbound comets may mean larger one to come

.

Is It Strange That FEMA Wants to Buy 140 Million Packaged Meals with a Shelf Life Only 36 Months for a Specific Disaster Scenario?

January 23rd, 2011 I’m sure that there are plenty of reasons why this isn’t weird, but I’ll just make a note of it in case Coincidence strikes.

.

MOON ROTATES ON ITS AXIS. HOW?
The Moon is in synchronous rotation: it rotates about its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit the Earth. This results in it nearly always keeping the same face turned towards the Earth. The Moon used to rotate at a faster rate, but early in its history, its rotation slowed and became locked in this orientation as a result of frictional effects associated with tidal deformations caused by the Earth.[29] The side of the Moon that faces Earth is called the near side, and the opposite side the far side. The far side is often called the “dark side,” but in fact, it is illuminated as often as the near side: once per lunar day, during the new Moon phase we observe on Earth when the near side is dark.[30]
……………………………..

Relationship to Earth

The Earth has a pronounced axial tilt; the Moon's orbit is not perpendicular to Earth's axis, but lies close to the Earth's orbital plane. 

Schematic of the Earth-Moon system (without a consistent scale)

Orbit

Main articles: Orbit of the Moon and Lunar theory

The Moon makes a complete orbit around the Earth with respect to the fixed stars about once every 27.3 days[nb 6] (its sidereal period). However, since the Earth is moving in its orbit about the Sun at the same time, it takes slightly longer for the Moon to show the same phase to Earth, which is about 29.5 days[nb 7] (its synodic period).[40] Unlike most satellites of other planets, the Moon orbits nearer the ecliptic plane than to the planet’sequatorial plane. The Moon’s orbit is subtly perturbed by the Sun and Earth in many small, complex and interacting ways. For example, the plane of the Moon’s orbital motion gradually rotates, which affects other aspects of lunar motion. These follow-on effects are mathematically described by Cassini’s laws.[79]

Relative size

The dark shadowed disk of the Moon moves across the face of the quarter-phase Earth, covering only a small part of the cloud-swirled semicircle. 

Comparative sizes of the Earth and the Moon, as imaged at separation of 50 million km[80]

The Moon is exceptionally large relative to the Earth: a quarter the diameter of the planet and 1/81 its mass.[40] It is the largest moon in the solar system relative to the size of its planet (although Charon is larger relative to the dwarf planet Pluto).[81]

However, the Earth and Moon are still considered a planet–satellite system, rather than a double-planet system, as their barycentre, the common centre of mass, is located 1,700 km (about a quarter of the Earth’s radius) beneath the surface of the Earth.[82]

Appearance from Earth

The Moon has an exceptionally low albedo, giving it a similar reflectance to coal. Despite this, it is the second brightest object in the sky after the Sun.[40][nb 8] This is partly due to the brightness enhancement of the opposition effect; at quarter phase, the Moon is only one-tenth as bright, rather than half as bright, as at full Moon.[83]Additionally, colour constancy in the visual system recalibrates the relations between the colours of an object and its surroundings, and since the surrounding sky is comparatively dark, the sunlit Moon is perceived as a bright object. The edges of the full Moon seem as bright as the centre, with no limb darkening, due to the reflective properties of lunar soil, which reflects more light back towards the Sun than in other directions. The Moon does appear larger when close to the horizon, but this is a purely psychological effect, known as the Moon illusion, first described in the 7th century BC.[84]

.

The monthly changes of angle between the direction of illumination by the Sun and viewing from Earth, and the phases of the Moon that result

Tidal effects

The tides on the Earth are mostly generated by the gradient in intensity of the Moon’s gravitational pull from one side of the Earth to the other, the tidal forces. This forms two tidal bulges on the Earth, which are most clearly seen in elevated sea level as ocean tides.[89] Since the Earth spins about 27 times faster than the Moon moves around it, the bulges are dragged along with the Earth’s surface faster than the Moon moves, rotating around the Earth once a day as it spins on its axis.[89] The ocean tides are magnified by other effects: frictional coupling of water to Earth’s rotation through the ocean floors, the inertia of water’s movement, ocean basins that get shallower near land, and oscillations between different ocean basins.[90] The gravitational attraction of the Sun on the Earth’s oceans is almost half that of the Moon, and their gravitational interplay is responsible for spring and neap tides.[89]

Over one lunar month more than half of the Moon's surface can be seen from the surface of the Earth. 

The libration of the Moon over a single lunar month.

Gravitational coupling between the Moon and the bulge nearest the Moon acts as a torque on the Earth’s rotation, draining angular momentum and rotational kinetic energy from the Earth’s spin.[89][91] In turn, angular momentum is added to the Moon’s orbit, accelerating it, which lifts the Moon into a higher orbit with a longer period. As a result, the distance between the Earth and Moon is increasing, and the Earth’s spin slowing down.[91] Measurements from lunar ranging experiments with laser reflectors left during the Apollo missions have found that the Moon’s distance to the Earth increases by 38 mm per year[92] (though this is only 0.10 ppb/year of the radius of the Moon’s orbit). Atomic clocks also show that the Earth’s day lengthens by about 15 microseconds every year,[93] slowly increasing the rate at which UTC is adjusted by leap seconds. This tidal drag will continue until the spin of the Earth has slowed to match the orbital period of the Moon; however, long before this could happen, the Sun will have become a red giant, engulfing the Earth.[94][95]

The lunar surface also experiences tides of amplitude ~10 cm over 27 days, with two components: a fixed one due to the Earth, as they are in synchronous rotation, and a varying component from the Sun.[91] The Earth-induced component arises from libration, a result of the Moon’s orbital eccentricity; if the Moon’s orbit were perfectly circular, there would only be solar tides.[91] Libration also changes the angle from which the Moon is seen, allowing about 59% of its surface to be seen from the Earth (but only half at any instant).[40] The cumulative effects of stress built up by these tidal forces produces moonquakes. Moonquakes are much less common and weaker than earthquakes, although they can last for up to an hour – a significantly longer time than terrestrial earthquakes – because of the absence of water to damp out the seismic vibrations. The existence of moonquakes was an unexpected discovery from seismometers placed on the Moon by Apollo astronauts from 1969 through 1972.[96]……………………………………

.
Luis Miguel Goitizolo writes: 

  • To me, one of the most intriguing characteristics of both the Moon and the Sun is the fact that the distance from each one of them to the Earth is about 108 times their respective diameters, which among other things makes they look equally big in the sky to us humans despite of the fact that they actually differ in size dramatically from each other.
  • It is facts like this that make me think the trio formed by the Earth, the Sun and the Moon is unique in the universe or at least in our galaxy, since the probability for such a triple coincidence to occur by chance even once in the course of a cosmic manifestation is equal to one into a number so vast that it is almost inexistent. And if we add to it the fact that the number 108, so sacred among Hindus, a cyclic or “circular” number, is the 240th of the length of the cycle of precession of the equinoxes (25,920 years), which is determinant in the duration and characteristics of the seasons, the probability becomes virtually null.
  • Another interesting fact in all this is we breath approximately 18 times in one minute, 18 being another cyclic number by excellence and the basic form of 108; and that 18 times 4 is 72, the length in years of one degree of the precessional cycle and the approximate number of times a human heart pulses in one minute.
  • Summing up, there is every reason to believe the Earth was somehow created by a supremely intelligent and powerful being (you may call Him God or whatever name you like and respect), along with the Sun and Moon, as a unique cosmic system capable to host and nurture, with the help of those perfect luminaries and of everything else in the world (but especially of those perfect luminaries) not only us, but also every other living entities here (but most especially us). If other powerful entities were employed to help in a process where time was not a problem, since time is but an abstraction from his supreme point of view, that is only accessory.
  • What I cannot understand is why scientists find so difficult to understand a simple reasoning like this.
Advertisements